Apollo Accelerators

Apollo Accelerators Discussion Forum
» » »
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]
Author Message
TuKo
Post subject: NoFPU Software Posted: Sun 18 Dec 2016 14:01
Offline
Administrateur du site
User avatar
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu 17 Nov 2016 23:29
Location: Switzerland
Contact: YouTube
With the rise of Apollo 68080 core and the FPU needing more testing, some software needed a recompile to work on current Vampire cores.

Here is a sum up list of them :
* GuiGFX.library : http://aminet.net/package/dev/misc/guigfxlib_nofpu
* Ixemul.library : http://aminet.net/package/dev/lib/ixemul-48.3-bin-m68k (use ixemul-48.3-3-bin-m68k/sys/libs/ixemul-020s.library)
* Render.library : http://aminet.net/package/dev/misc/renderlib301
* SysInfo 4.0 : http://aminet.net/package/util/moni/SysInfo40_noFPU
* MadPlay : http://aminet.net/package/mus/play/madplay / http://aminet.net/package/util/libs/mpega_libmad
* ScummVM 1.8.1 : http://aminet.net/package/game/misc/scummvm-1.8.1-rtg

_________________

A600, V600 V2, A604n+Indi+RTC, CF 32Gb, WiFi
A500+, V500 V2+, Kipper 1MB ChipRAM, CF 32GB, Indivision ECS, ESP8266, Plipbox
A4000D, CS MK2 68060@66MHz 128Mb, Indi MK2cr, CF 16Gb, CV64 4Mb, FastATA MK-VI, Ariadne II


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
darksun9210
Post subject: Re: NoFPU Software Posted: Tue 3 Jan 2017 21:54
Offline
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue 27 Dec 2016 23:35
Location: London, UK
awesome, just what I've been after! :)

many thanks

_________________

Vampire loaded
A500 + A600
Awaiting Vamps ;)
A1200x3, A3000, A4000, CD32


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
chris2029
Post subject: Re: NoFPU Software Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 12:55
Offline
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon 9 Jan 2017 12:34
Thanks


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jarp
Post subject: Re: NoFPU Software Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:38
Offline
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue 3 Jan 2017 18:43
So when there is multiple CPU choices, which version should we pick? 020, 040, 060?

I was under impression that Apollo Core behaves mostly like 68040 so 040 would be my pick but opening posts says at least for ixemul that 020 is the correct one...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
chris2029
Post subject: Re: NoFPU Software Posted: Tue 10 Jan 2017 11:21
Offline
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon 9 Jan 2017 12:34
020 is fully compatible i wouldn't worry and yes that is the correct one.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jarp
Post subject: Re: NoFPU Software Posted: Tue 9 May 2017 07:59
Offline
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue 3 Jan 2017 18:43
Wait, should mpega_libmad from Aminet be non-FPU? It always crashes with 8000 000B for me.

I am asking because I recompiled a new version with -msoft-float and libm instead of libm040 and then it works. Is it due to FPU or something is libm040 incompatible with current core or something?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
vox
Post subject: Re: NoFPU Software Posted: Tue 6 Jun 2017 15:59
Offline
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue 6 Jun 2017 15:15
jarp wrote: *  Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:38
So when there is multiple CPU choices, which version should we pick? 020, 040, 060?

I was under impression that Apollo Core behaves mostly like 68040 so 040 would be my pick but opening posts says at least for ixemul that 020 is the correct one...
If libraries for 030,040 or 060 are for EC CPUs )no MMU, no FPU) we would ideally
use those for 68EC060, but that doesnt exist (not the CPU, Amiga libs and executables optimized)

So best are 68EC040, or 040 no FPU no MMU code.

020 is safe just because it is faster in code then 00, and yet didnt officially came with FPU (was addon) and MMU newer existed.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ] Return to “General Chat”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


» The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC+02:00

cron