Yes so 800K or so people clicked on the link watched it didn't really go back to it, makes sense I didn't either.rshimada wrote:I’ve gone nuclear. Some readers may want to skip right past this post.
ericdc30 wrote: Also the trend seems to favour vintage Macs (see https://www.google.com/trends/explore?q ... osh%20Plus ).That is true because accelerators for older Macs ageing and hard to find. People want options.rshimada wrote:The only upgrade in the videos is replacing a SCSI drive.
rshimada wrote: The statistics listed are worthless: “views” do not mean “owns or is planning to own”. YouTube is especially volatile; in https://twitter.com/Techmoan/status/818604957251334144 Techmoan wrote:Always a bit sad seeing videos that took years to assemble, fade after 48hrs, but it's all part of the YouTube game...so on to the next one
How is that even remotely related? I challenge you to find any youtube video with more than 800 000 views featuring the AMIGA in the context of retro computing upgrades or retro computing restoration.rshimada wrote: The “Gangnum Style” video has over 2 billion views - how many people danced that way as a result?
I suggested a couple options and pointed out that the Macintosh Plus or Macintosh SE could be a good target for various reasons (see original post for details).rshimada wrote: A practical problem with creating accelerators for 68K Macs is that there were too many models; see https://wiki.68kmla.org/List_of_Apple_m ... _processor
That explains it. You do realize that there are other demographics of people that never got exposed to the AMIGA at all right? In North America for example a total of 700,000 AMIGAs were sold compared to 6 million for the Macintosh Plus. That is why people are interested in restoring these old machines.rshimada wrote:My comments are entirely intuitive.Where are you getting your data? Are you just going by gut feeling?
I agree that most of the value of having a computer is in the software. It is a fact that the Mac 68K line of computers has much more software than the AMIGA. I don't want to get into a flame war over this because the AMIGA has fantastic software especially in the gaming department. But you can't in good faith ignore the fact that many of the software titles on the 68K Mac have high historical value (it shaped the software we used today) and naturally nostalgia value. Not sure how practical it would be to use it as a primary computer in 2017 however but the same can be said for the AMIGA. I think if you can do that your use of a computer is pretty limited to begin with.rshimada wrote: I’m involved in retro computing so think I have an understanding of it. I remember when the Apple II, Commodore PET and TRS-80 were new.
My career has included writing software for computers such as the Apple II and Commodore 64. That job allowed me to see a Macintosh on the day that it was announced.
When the first issues of AmigaWorld and MacWorld magazines were published I purchased them.
Our house has a number of (color) Macs and I am using one now.The early Macs have a 9 inch black and white screen with a resolution of 512 x 342.By the way the black and white screen and UI is part of the charm of these machines.
9 inch black and white screens were common enough on early Apple IIs. Consequent green screens were larger.
At the Amiga 30th Event, Ron Nicholson mentioned that when he was at Apple, Steve Jobs had said that the Mac would never have color.Accelerators are created for software that is too slow to be usable.Why do Mac people need an accelerator? The same reason you use an Amiga in 2017 nostalgia and curiosity that's all.
The Vampire has ignited interest because it allows an Amiga to be used for some of today’s computing.
Amiga users are extremely determined and innovative people, which is subject deserves a post by itself. Mac users don’t come anywhere near this.For the casual reader, maxing out a Mac Plus isn’t difficult because it has:Whenever people get a vintage machine they almost always want to max out the specs to extend the range of possibilities. What fun is a Macintosh Plus with 1MB or 4MB of RAM or with a 68000 running at 8MHz and a 20MB HDD (if you're lucky)?
- 2 serial ports (one can be connected to LocalTalk)
- A floppy drive port (can support the HD20 hard drive)
- A SCSI port
You’ve described the machine with charm and now it’s no fun?!
- A mono speaker port
Now I understand: You want an SE/30. For the casual readers:
- The Mac Plus was the first usable Macintosh. It was the first personal computer to have a built in SCSI port. The Amiga was announced before the Mac Plus.
I would hope that most Mac Plus owners who want a faster machine would buy one - they’re affordable now.
- The SE/30 has a 16Mhz 68030 and FPU. It has two internal drive bays, one usually has a SCSI drive. It has a Processor Direct Slot allowing for upgrades.The value of having a computer is using software.People want to see a 500HP V8 in a Austin Mini that is what makes it fun.
Using an accelerator just to get a better benchmark number is a stunt, a gimmick.
A 500HP V8 Mini can only be fun when there’s a good stretch of road to drive it on.
As a software developer I was thinking of heading over to macintoshgarden.org and explore the compilers, IDEs, assemblers and see how things evolved over the years. Perhaps revisit old games I played like Shufflepuck, SimCity, etc and various other apps I used. Maybe try to get it online with a browser. Also there are some kids games such as Arthur's Computer Adventure that my daughter would probably enjoy. But that is me personally. Having an accelerator with a tons of RAM and potentially fast disk access means I can focus on a single Macintosh Plus or Macintosh SE and not have to buy a whole lineup of computers.rshimada wrote:
What are you going to run on a Mac Plus to make creating an accelerator worth the effort?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ty_Mac.png